Reform UK's policy platform promises some of the biggest tax cuts in modern British political history — raising the income tax threshold, slashing corporation tax, and cutting fuel duty among others. It also claims to have found the savings to pay for them. Independent economists disagree. Sharply.
| Policy | Saving (£bn) | Cost (£bn) | Running total (£bn) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax cuts | |||
| Raise income tax threshold to £20,000 | — | −50.0 | −50.0 |
| Raise higher rate threshold to £70,000 | — | −8.0 | −58.0 |
| Cut corporation tax to 15% | — | −37.0 | −95.0 |
| Raise inheritance tax threshold to £2m | — | −2.0 | −97.0 |
| Cut fuel duty by 20p | — | −5.0 | −102.0 |
| Scrap VAT on energy bills | — | −1.5 | −103.5 |
| Other tax relief (stamp duty, IR35, NICs) | — | −5.0 | −108.5 |
| Spending increases | |||
| NHS spending increase | — | −17.0 | −125.5 |
| Policing & prison capacity | — | −4.0 | −129.5 |
| Deportation Command & detention centres | — | −3.0 | −132.5 |
| Claimed savings | |||
| Cut "wasteful" government spending | +50.0 | — | −82.5 |
| Stop Bank of England QE interest payments (disputed — real value ~£20bn) | +35.0 | — | −47.5 |
| Cut overseas aid | +6.0 | — | −41.5 |
| Immigration enforcement savings (10yr estimate) | +4.2 | — | −37.3 |
| Scrap net zero subsidies | +15.0 | — | −22.3 |
| Welfare reform / stricter assessments | +5.0 | — | −17.3 |
| Subtotal (Reform's own figures) | +115.2 | −132.5 | −17.3 |
| Independent adjustments (IFS / Tax Policy Associates) | |||
| Tax cuts underestimated by Reform | — | −18.0 | −35.3 |
| QE saving overstated (Neidle estimate) | −15.0 | — | −50.3 |
| Welfare/efficiency savings unachievable in full | −15.0 | — | −65.3 |
| Estimated real annual shortfall | ≈ −£65bn/yr | ||
Sources: Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) manifesto reaction, June 2024; Tax Policy Associates analysis, June 2024; Reform UK manifesto 2024. Figures are estimates; some policies lack official costing.
Reform present a gap of around £17bn in their own figures. Independent analysts put the real hole at £33–65bn per year.
| The problem | Why the numbers don't hold up | Reform claims | Real estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Costs are underestimated | |||
| Corporation tax cut
25% → 15%
|
Reform costed all business tax cuts at £18bn/yr. The IFS says the corporation tax cut alone costs more than that in the long run — the real figure is closer to £37bn/yr. | £18bn | £37bn+ |
| Income tax threshold
£12,570 → £20,000
|
Tax Policy Associates recalculated and found the real cost of all personal tax cuts combined is at least £88bn — not the £70bn Reform claims. | £70bn | £88bn+ |
| NHS pledge
Eliminate waiting lists in 2 years
|
The IFS says the proposed £17bn/yr increase would not be "nearly enough" to meet this commitment. The real cost of delivering it would be significantly higher. | £17bn | Much more |
| Savings are overstated | |||
| Stop BoE QE interest
Paying banks on reserves
|
Reform claims £35bn/yr. Tax expert Dan Neidle calculates it is overstated by at least £15bn — and the cost would partly fall on businesses and consumers, not just banks. | £35bn | ~£20bn |
| Cut "wasteful" spending
Across all departments
|
£50bn in efficiency savings with no detail on where. The IFS says this "would almost certainly require substantial cuts to the quantity or quality of public services" — not just cutting waste. | £50bn | Unverified |
| Immigration savings
Deportations & ILR changes
|
Reform projects large long-term savings, but the upfront cost of deportation flights, detention centres, and legal challenges is substantial and uncosted. Savings are a 10-year projection, not near-term. | £42bn
over 10 yrs
|
Disputed |
| The structural problem | |||
| No detail on what gets cut
The £300bn state reduction
|
Reform's deputy leader confirmed the goal is reducing the state to 35% of GDP — implying ~£300bn in cuts. But the manifesto never specifies which services, departments, or programmes would be reduced. | Vague | Uncosted |
| Growth assumption
Economy fixes the gap
|
Reform implies faster growth pays for much of this. The IFS says even "extremely optimistic" growth assumptions don't close the gap — they never have for any party that has tried this approach. | Optimistic | Not enough |
| Estimated real annual shortfall — IFS / Tax Policy Associates | £33–65bn / year | ||